We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
International Poster Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine



Forgotten password?


Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 15 (2013), No. 1     15. Mar. 2013

Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 2013, Vol 15 No 1, Poster 636

Inter-operator reliability of overlay generation techniques in bite mark analysis

Language: English

Dr. Mihir Khatri, Postgraduate Resident, Dr. Mariappan Jonathan Daniel, Professor and Head,
Department Of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Pondicherry, Puducherry UT, India

8th to 11th December, 2011.
23rd National Conference of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Poster Award
2nd best poster award


Overlays are representative of incisal edges of the teeth produced over transparent sheet. They are used most commonly for comparison of bite mark pattern of a suspect with that found on an animate or inanimate object. It is the most common technique of comparing the bite marks. With time many techniques of overlay generation have evolved like the manual, photocopying and computer assisted technique.


1) To evaluate various overlay generation techniques.
2) To evaluate the inter-operator reliability in comparing the overlays generated.

Material and Methods

Twenty-five individuals participated in the study. Impressions of maxillary and mandibular arches of these individuals were made and dental study models prepared in dental stone. Overlay production was done by manual, photocopying and computer assisted technique. In manual technique a sheet of transparency film and a fine tipped pen were used to mark the perimeter of the biting surface. In the photocopying technique an accurate image of the dental model was made. Then the image placed upside down on a radiographic view box and the tooth edge outlines were traced. These outlines were then photocopied on a transparent sheet. In the computer assisted technique first the study models were scanned and then a gradual selection of biting edges of the teeth was done using magic wand selection tool resident in the Photoshop software version 7. The image obtained was printed on transparent sheet. Finally the overlays obtained by each method were compared amongst themselves by two operators.


In our study the inter-operator reliability was found to be highest in computer generated overlay method with kappa coefficient of 0.5614 having a moderate degree of agreement. The values for manual and photocopying generated overlays were 0.3772 and 0.4231 respectively:

Manual Method (Matching)

Fig. 1: Biting edges being traced Fig. 2: Manual overlay
Observer I Observer II Total
No Slight Moderate Excellent
No 0 0 0 0 0
Slight 0 5 4 0 9
Moderate 0 3 13 0 16
Excellent 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 8 17 0 25
Test Statistics: Kappa Coefficient: 0.3772 (agreement)

Photocopying Method (Matching)

Fig. 3: Dental model being photocopied Fig. 4: Photocopied dental model
Fig. 5: Traced biting edges Fig. 6: Photocopied overlay
Observer I Observer II Total
No Slight Moderate Excellent
No 0 0 0 0 0
Slight 0 3 0 0 3
Moderate 0 2 10 7 19
Excellent 0 0 0 3 3
Total 0 5 10 10 25
Test Statistics: Kappa Coefficient: 0.4231 (agreement)

Computer Generated Method (Matching)

Fig. 7: Dental model being scanned Fig. 8: Scanned dental model
Fig. 9: Biting edges selected by magical wand selection tool Fig. 10: Computer assisted overlay
Observer I Observer II Total
No Slight Moderate Excellent
No 0 0 0 0 0
Slight 0 1 0 0 1
Moderate 0 0 10 1 11
Excellent 0 0 5 8 13
Total 0 1 15 9 25
Test Statistics: Kappa Coefficient: 0.5614 (agreement)


The principle of bite mark analysis is based on the premise that no two people have similar teeth and hence the bite marks made are dissimilar. Historically, manual technique was the only technique known for generating overlays and was used in about 1966, but now improved techniques like photocopying and computer aided overlay generation techniques is available. One of the limitations of the overlays is that they are two dimensional representatives of three dimensional bite marks. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first of its kind measuring the inter-operator reliability of the various overlay generation techniques. Past studies have studied the various overlay generation techniques with the intent of finding the best technique of overlay generation, with matching done by a single examiner. As two examiners conducted the observation in our study, we were able to find the inter-operator reliability of the overlays generated. The computer assisted overlays were found to give reliable results when matched by more than one examiner.


  1. Robert B.J. Dorion; Bitemark evidence. (1st ed.). Marcel Dekker, New York, 2005.
  2. Dailey JC; A practical technique for the fabrication of transparent bite mark overlays. J Forensic Sci. 1991;36(2):565-570.
  3. Wood RE, Miller PA, Blenkinsop BR; Image editing and computer assisted bitemark analysis: a case report. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1994;12(2):30-36.
  4. Sweet D, Parhar M, Wood RE; Computer-based production of bite mark comparison overlays. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43(5):1050-1055.
  5. Kouble RF, Craig GT; A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49(1):111-118.
  6. Tuceryan M, Li F, Blitzer HL, Parks ET, Platt JA; A framework for estimating probability of a match in forensic bite mark identification. J Forensic Sci. 2011.; 56(1):S83-89.
  7. Sweet D, Bowers CM; Accuracy of bite mark overlays: a comparison of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect's dentition. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43(2):362-367.
  8. McNamee AH, Sweet D, Pretty I; A comparative reliability analysis of computer-generated bitemark overlays. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50(2):400-405.
  9. Wu Y, Chen X, Sun D; An experimental study on human bitemarks digital analysis and its accuracy. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2005;22(5):918-921.
  10. Maloth S, Ganapathy KS; Comparison between five commonly used two-dimensional methods of human bite mark overlay production from dental study casts. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(3):499-505.

This Poster was submitted by Dr. Mihir Khatri.

Correspondence address:
Dr. Mihir Khatri
Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Department Of Oral Medicine and Radiology
Pondicherry - 605006
Puducherry UT