We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
International Poster Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine



Forgotten password?


Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 12 (2010), No. 4     15. Dec. 2010

Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 2010, Vol 12 No 4, Poster 511

Effect of Er:YAG laser beam angle and focal distance on the ultrastructural morphology of enamel

An ESEM Investigation

Language: English

Dr. Rukshin S. Irani, Postgraduate student, Prof. Dr. Sucheta Sathe, Prof. Dr. Vivek Hegde, Head of department,
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, M. A.Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Pune, India
Dr. Naresh.Thukral, Senior lecturer, Founder president SOLA India,
Dept. of Periodontology, M. A.Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Pune, India

21st-23rd November 2008
23rd FODI & 16th IES National Conference
Chandigarh, India

Poster Award
Best poster (Research category)


In the past decade, extensive research in the field of laser dentistry has led to an increased use of lasers in clinical practice, (3-5) for removal of dental hard tissues prior to application of restorative materials (1,2) Er:YAG lasers emit a wavelength of 2.94µm, which coincides with the absorption band of water.The laser energy emitted is well absorbed by hydroxyapatite and more efficiently ablates enamel & dentin in comparison to other laser systems (6).
Hard tissue removal using lasers is a dynamic process &the use of variable laser parameters like pulse energy,pulse repetition rates,wavelength specificity to ablate enamel have been shown to produce morphological changes (7,8). The use of different beam angles and focal distances of the laser beam seem to be extremely important when considering enamel morphological changes.However literature reports regarding the same are deficient.The present in vitro study conducted evaluates the ultrastructural changes seen in enamel while varying the laser parameters of focal distance & beam angle of the Er:YAG laser.

Aim & Objective

To evaluate the effect of 3 different beam angles & 3 different focal distances on the ultrastructural morphology of enamel. To correlate these changes clinically.

Material and Methods

Thirty five non carious human premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were selected for the study.Each tooth was sectioned upto the cervical third of the root keeping the crown intact (figure 1) & placed in position on the beam angle apparatus to carry out the laser irradiation (figure 2).Each tooth specimen was irradiated with the Er:YAG laser using a non contact handpiece (figure 3) as follows, keeping pulse energy of 250mJ, 15Hz frequency at very short pulse duration (figure 4) constant for all the groups:

Group Focal Distance Beam Angle
Group 1 5mm 90°
Group 2 7mm 90°
Group 3 10mm 90°
Tab. 1: Groups evaluated for variable focal distances
Group Focal Distance Beam Angle
Group 4 7mm 30°
Group 5 7mm 45°
Group 6 7mm 60°
Group 7 7mm 90°
Tab. 2: Groups evaluated for variable beam angles

Following laser irradiation the enamel surfaces of each specimen were observed under the Environment Scanning Electron Microscope(ESEM). (figure 5)

Beam angle apparatus
An apparatus specially designed to facilitate an accurate setting of focal distance & beam angle was used for all groups.The apparatus consists of the following parts:
Protractor: To permit adjustment of an accurate beam angle value.
Measuring scale: To facilitate setting of an accurate focal distance.
Metal Platform: To enable stable placement of tooth specimen for laser irradiation. (figure 13)

Fig. 1: Premolar specimen Fig. 2: Laser Beam Irradiation
Fig. 3: Er;YAG Laser Noncontact Handpiece Fig. 4: Er:YAG Laser Parameters
Fig. 5: ESEM



Groups evaluated for variable focal distances An absence of smear layer may be appreciated in all groups
GROUP 1- 5mm, 90 °: Areas of melting and remineralization (figure 6)
GROUP 2- 7mm, 90°:Crater like defect formation (figure 7)
GROUP 3- 10mm, 90°: Areas of melting and remineralisation with cracks (figure 8)

Groups evaluated for variable beam angles
An absence of smear layer may be appreciated in all groups
GROUP 4- 30° beam angle, 7mm focal distance: Laser beam has brushed past the surface of enamel (figure 9)
GROUP 5 -45° beam angle, 7mm focal distance: Microretentive pattern formation (figure 10)
GROUP 6- 60° beam angle, 7mm focal distance: Microretentive pattern formation with cracks (figure 11)
GROUP 7- 90° beam angle, 7mm focal distance: Crater like defect formation (figure 12)

Fig. 6: Group 1 - 5mm focal distance, 90° beam angle Fig. 7: Group 2 - 7mm focal distance, 90° beam angle
Fig. 8: Group 3 - 10mm focal distance, 90° beam angle Fig. 9: Group 4 - 30° beam angle, 7mm focal distance
Fig. 10: Group 5 - 45° beam angle, 7mm focal distance Fig. 11: Group 6 - 60° beam angle, 7mm focal distance
Fig. 12: Group 7 - 90° beam angle, 7mm focal distance
Fig. 13: Beam angle apparatus


The following conclusions may be drawn from the present study:
1.Regarding beam angle, 60° provides increased microretentive features & surface roughness at 7mm focal distance, hence it is preferred for procedures requiring etched enamel surfaces.
2.The focal distance of 7mm with beam angle of 90° facilitates increased ablation of enamel surfaces with considerable surface roughness as well thus making it suitable to be used for caries removal.


Enamel morphology following preparation of the surface with lasers plays an important role in bonding procedures.Previous studies conducted (9,4) have stated that Er:YAG lasers may be used as a viable alternative to conventional mechanical preparation as well as conventional acid etching provided the precise laser parameters may be achieved.The influence of variable parameters of laser irradiation on the enamel morphology seem to be of extreme clinical relevance.
In the current study,the enamel surfaces treated with the Er:YAG laser handpiece in non contact mode ,keeping the beam angle angle constant at 90° and varying the focal distances revealed scaly irregular surfaces with an absence of smear layer. There seems to be a tendency of greater ablation when using 7mm focal distance and beam angle 90°, clinically, facilitating efficient caries removal. Different surface changes were observed when the focal distance was kept constant at 7mm with variable beam angles of 30, 45, 60 and 90°. Comparatively less microcracks,increased surface roughness with pronounced microretentive features with beam angle 60° and focal distance 7mm reveals that this seems to be more relevant for adhesive procedures.
An understanding of how the variable laser parameters influence enamel topography/morphology is essential for dentists, to facilitate selection of the appropriate technique for different procedures in restorative dentistry.This expertise in the use of recent technologies is a key factor in achieving clinical success.


  1. Matsumoto K,Nakamura Y,Mazeki K,Kimura Y:Clinical dental application of Er:YAG Laser for Class V Cavity preparation.J Clin Laser Med Surg 1996;14:123-127.
  2. Keller U,Hibst R,Guertsen W,et al:Er:YAG Laser application in caries therapy:Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance.J Dent 1998;26:649-656.
  3. Wigdor H,Abt E,Ashrafi S et al:The effect of lasers on dental hard tissues.J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:65-70.
  4. D.C. Attrill, S.R. Farrar, T.A. King, M.R. Dickinson, R.M. Davies and A.S. Blinkhorn: Er:YAG (2.94µm) Laser Etching of Dental Enamel as an Alternative to Acid Etching; Lasers Med Sci 2000, 15:154-161.
  5. Hossain M,Nakamura Y,Yamada Y,et al:Ablation depths and morphological changes in human enamel and dentin after Er;YAG laser irradiation with or without water mist.Lasers surg Med 1999;17:105-109.
  6. Wigdor HA,Walsh JT,et al:Lasers in dentistry.Laser Surg Med;1995:16,103-133.
  7. Keller U.Hibst R:Ultrastructural changes of enamel and dentin following Er:YAG Laser irradiation on teeth.SPIE 1990;1200:408-415.
  8. Li ZZ Code JE,Van De Merwe WP:Er:YAG Laser ablation of enamel and dentin of human teeth:determination of ablation rates at various fluences and pulse repetition rates.Laser Surg Med 1992;12:625-630.
  9. Paghdiwala A:Application of the erbium :YAG laser on hard dental tissues;Measurement of the temperature changes and depth of cut.Laser Res Med Surg Dent ICABLO 1995 ,64:192-115.
  10. Hibst R:Lasers for caries removal and cavity preparation:state of the art and future directions.J Oral Laser Applic 2002;2:203-212.


The author wishes to thank
1. Dr. Niranjan Vatkar (MDS) for designing the beam angle apparatus for the study.
2. Mr. Dheeraj Suryavanshi (Automotive research association of India, Pune) for carrying out the ESEM investigation.


ESEM - Environment Scanning Electron Microscope VSP - Very short Pulse SOLA - Society of Oral Laser Application FODI - Federation of Operative Dentistry ,India IES - Indian Endodontic Society

This Poster was submitted by Dr. Rukshin S. Irani.

Correspondence address:
Dr. Rukshin S. Irani
M. A. Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre
2414, East Street, 1st floor, Camp
Maharashtra, India