We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
International Poster Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine
Login:
username:

password:

Plattform:

Forgotten password?

Registration

Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 10 (2008), No. 2     15. June 2008

Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 2008, Vol 10 No 02, Poster 405

Identification Procedures of Dead Bodies by Dental Means

Language: English
 

Authors:
Dr. med. Dr. med. dent. Claus Grundmann
Institut für Rechtsmedizin, Duisburg
Dr. med. dent. Hans-Peter Kirsch
AKFOS, Saarbrücken
Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Rüdiger Lessig
Institut für Rechtsmedizin, Universität Leipzig
Dr. med. Dr. med. dent. Klaus Rötzscher
AKFOS, Speyer

Date/Event/Venue:
04.-05. October 2007
XVII ème Congrès A.F.I.O.
Gent, Belgium
 

Introduction

The unique structures and traits of human teeth and jaws readily lend themselves to use in the identification of living persons and deceased victims. Dental data can be recovered and recorded at the time of postmortem examination and compared to antemortem data which are supplied by generalist and/or specialist dentists who treated the victim during her/his lifetime. The teeth are well protected in the oral cavity and are able to withstand many external influences near, at or after the time of death. Teeth comprise the hardest substances in the human body, so as the body\'s soft tissues decompose, the dental characteristics which are so valuable for identification purposes remain accessible.

This is especially true concerning tooth treatments, such as restorative and aesthetic fillings and crowns, root canal procedures and dentures since these are custom-made as unique treatments for each individual. But other anatomical and morphological traits can also be compared even in absence of any dental treatment.

Objectives

The conclusions available to the DVI odontologist to choose of, following his comparison of postmortem and antemortem dental records includes:

  • Positive identification: PM and AM records are from the same person
  • Possible identification: Cannot be excluded as the same person but minimal data is present
  • Negative identification: PM and AM records are from different persons
  • Inconclusive: Insufficient dental data are present to reach a conclusion
     

Material and Methods

Documentation

  • Interpol dental chart (without roots) (Fig. 1)
  • A new dental chart with roots (Fig. 2)
  • Plass data PM-dental chart (without roots) (Fig. 3)
     
Fig. 1: Interpol dental chart (without roots) Fig. 2: A new dental chart (with roots) Fig. 3 Plass data PM-dental chart (without roots)
 

Maceration

  • Ultrasound instrument for the maceration with ENZYRIM® (Fig. 4)
  • Upper and lower jaws after maceration with ENZYRIM® (Fig. 5)
     
Fig. 4: Ultrasound instrument for the maceration with ENZYRIM® Fig. 5 Upper and lower jaws after maceration with ENZYRIM®

Photography

  • Upper jaw after maceration with ENZYRIM® - belongs to Fig. 8 (Fig. 6)
  • Plaster model (after orthodontic treatment) and the upper jaw of a burned person - after maceration with ENZYRIM® (Fig. 7)
     
Fig. 6: Upper jaw after maceration with ENZYRIM® - belongs to Fig. 8 Fig. 7: Plaster model (after orthodontic treatment) and the upper jaw of a burned person (after maceration with ENZYRIM®)

X-rays

  • Antemortal x-ray - belongs to Fig. 6 (Fig. 8)
  • Digital dentalx-ray, possibility of several false colour display modes to enhance visibility of even slightest greyscale gradations (Fig. 9)
     
Fig. 8: Antemortal x-ray - belongs to Fig. 6 Fig. 9: Digital dental x-ray, possibility of several false colour display modes to enhance visibility of even slightest greyscale gradations
 

Results

The guidelines (DVI Guide-Draft odontology sections, March 21th, 2007) may be of assistance to police and dentists in obtaining corresponding antemortem data. Please note that often dentists refuse to release patients' original records for such purposes. But they must be encouraged to do so since original records are needed during a DVI response. It is appropriate for the police officer to suggest that the dentist keeps a duplicate of the records and then releases the original records to be used in the DVI effort:

  • Description of the individual's dental status
  • Original dental charts, treatment records, clinical photographs and x-rays, including original periapical radiographs, and/or bitewing radiographs and/or other x-rays (OPG films, panoramics, lateral cephalometrics, occlusals, etc.)
  • Cranial and/or sinus x-rays
  • CT scans of the head and/or cranium
  • Digital x-ray images (as a digital file and as a hard copy)
  • Dental casts (ceramic or plaster) of the upper and lower jaws and teeth
  • Impressions, moulds, bite registrations, temporary crowns, prostheses, etc.
  • Orthodontic casts, braces or other treatment appliances
  • Full face and intraoral photographs
  • Photographs of family members including the missing person and recent personal photographs or portraits in which the missing person\'s teeth are visible
  • Old false teeth, dental prostheses, dentures and other dental devices

The information listed above are needed in order to reconstruct the antemortem dental status of the victim with respect to existing restorations (incl. dental jewellery) and specific features suck malformation, anomalies and malocclusion.
The documentation of the dental status is prepared on the basis of available records and provides a precise description of existing dental restorations, including information regarding the materials used.
It is essential to ensure that all original treatment records are labelled with the name and date of birth of the patient, as well as dates, stamps and signatures of the treating dentist.
If the records and materials listed above cannot be obtained from the missing person\'s family dentist, the following persons and institutions may be potential sources of information:

  • Oral and maxillofacial surgeons
  • Orthodontists
  • Oral pathologists (dentists concerned primarily with dental anomalies)
  • Dental technicians, dental mechanics
  • Endodontists (root canal treatment specialists)
  • Paediatric dentists (specializing in dentistry for children)
  • School dental services
  • Public hospital dental clinics
  • Dental health insurers and Hospitals (where policyholders have been treated)
  • Dental records maintained by correctional facilities/hospitals/social security insurers
  • Military organizations

Conclusions

Postmortem dental examination
During the assessment of dental status, the standard nomenclature used in a given country should be used for national DVI operations. Internationally harmonized terms, codes, abbreviations and nomenclature are to be used for international DVI operations.
Exposed radiographs (x-ray films) are to be numbered individually and placed in numbered bags. Developed radiographs are to be mounted, numbered and sorted into numbered Ziplock bags. It may be necessary to obtain additional radiographs of specific features discovered during the initial examination.
Upper jaws should be left in place. The odontologist examiner is responsible for deciding whether isolated lower jaw removal is needed to achieve a better assessment of dental status.
If a decision is made to remove the lower jaw, every attempt shall be made to minimize the extent of surgical Intervention and to replace the tissues in their original position at the end of the examination. Every attempt must be made to reduce the risk of loss of these tissues.
Both the loosened lower jaw and the attached upper jaw can be cleaned and subjected to precise dental examination and radiography. The advantage of this approach is that maintaining the upper jaw in situ virtually eliminates the risk of subsequent mismatching. Once the examination is completed, the lower jaw is replaced and the incision closed if appropriate.
 

Literature

  1. Brannon RB, Kessler HP (1999) Problems in mass-disaster dental identifications: a retrospective review. J Forensic Sci 44: 123-127
  2. Endris R (1979) Praktische Forensische Odonto-Stomatologie. Kriminalistik Verlag Heidelberg
  3. Grundmann C (2005) Is the Dental Part of the Interpol-Form at the State-of-the-Art? AM/PM Documentation of dental findings.
  4. 17th Meeting of the INTERPOL Standing Committee on Disaster Identification. Lyon
  5. Grundmann C (2006) The removal and storage of jaws in connection with dental identification measures.
  6. 18th Meeting of the INTERPOL Standing Committee on Disaster Identification. Lyon
  7. Grundmann C, Rötzscher K (1999) Zur Sektionstechnik im orofazialen Bereich. Die Mazeration mit Enzyrim. Rechtsmedizin 9: 115-117
  8. Grundmann C, Rötzscher K (1999) Autopsy techniques in the orofacial area and maceration using Enzyrim. J Forensic Odontostomatol 18: 19-21
  9. Grundmann C, Rötzscher K (2005) The Odontological Identification of the Unknown Bodies. Int Poster J Dent Oral Med (IPJ), Vol 7, No 03, Poster 280
  10. Gustafson G (1966) Forensic Odontology. Staples Press London
  11. Interpol (2005) Disaster victim identification guide. http://www.interpol.com/Public/disasterVictim/guide/default.asp. Cited 12 Oct 2005
  12. James H et al. (2005) Thai Tsunami victim identification - Overview to date. J Forensic Odontostomatol 23: 1-18
  13. Lessig R (2000) Die forensische Stomatologie als Teil der rechtsmedizinischen Praxis In: Osteologische Altersschätzung und Identifikation (Hrsg Oehmichen M, Geserick, G) Research in Legal Medicine, Vol 26, Lübeck, Schmidt-Römhild, pp 67-74
  14. Lessig R, Benthaus S (2003) Forensische Odonto-Stomatologie. Rechtsmedizin 13: 161-169
  15. Pilz W (1974) Forensische Stomatologie. J.A.Barth Verlag Leipzig
  16. Pilz W, Reimann W, Krause D (1980) Gerichtliche Medizin für Stomatologen. J.A. Barth Verlag Leipzig
  17. Rötzscher K (2000) Forensische Zahnmedizin. Springer Verlag Berlin
  18. Rötzscher K, Benthaus S, Grundmann C, Höhmann B (1999) Zur Dokumentation zahnärztlicher Befunde. Kriminalistik, 53, pp 411-413
  19. Rötzscher K, Grundmann C, Lessig R, Kirsch HP (2006) What about Tsunami? Int Poster J Dent Oral Med (IPJ), Vol 8, No 02, Poster 315
  20. Rötzscher K, Solheim T (1998) Vergleich AM/PM Interpol-Formblatt. In: Leopold D Identifikation unbekannter Toter. Schmidt-Römhild, Lübeck, pp 419-421
  21. Stimson PG, Mertz CA (1997) Forensic Dentistry. CRC Press Boca Raton New York
  22. Whittaker D, McDonald G (1993) Atlas der Forensischen Zahnmedizin. Dtsch Ärzte Verlag Köln
     

This Poster was submitted by Dr. med. Dr. med. dent. Claus Grundmann.
 

Correspondence address:
Dr. med. Dr. med. dent. Claus Grundmann
Institut für Rechtsmedizin
Viktoriastr. 8
47166 Duisburg-Hamborn
Germany