We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website and to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage. You will find more information in our privacy policy. OK, I have understood
International Poster Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine



Forgotten password?


Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 4 (2002), No. 1     15. Mar. 2002

Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 2002, Vol 4 No 1, Poster 109

Robot assisted Dental Implantology

Language: English

Authors: Jakob Brief1, Stefan Haßfeld1, Robert Boesecke2, Michael Vogele3, Robert Krempien4, Martina Treiber4, Joachim Mühling1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Heidelberg
2TaMed GmbH, Hufschmiedstr. 1/4, D-69168 Wiesloch, Germany
3Medical Intelligence GmbH, Feyerabendstr. 13-15, D-86830 Schwabmünchen, Germany
4Department of Radiology, University of Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

09.06.01 - 10.06.01
2. Assistentenkongreß in der ZMK und an der 2. Jahrestagung des Arbeitskreises für Angewandte Informatik in der DGZMK
Berlin, Germany


We introduce a method to apply a preoperative 3D plan for inserting dental implants with an assisting medical robot. The treatment plan is based on the 3D visualization of the CT data of the patient's maxilla and mandible, and supplies the location of the implants in the patient's coordinates. The plan is then transferred to the surgical robot's coordinate system. The robot guides the tool, a drill guide. Position, orientation, and depth of the initial drilling is defined with the tool held by the robot while the surgeon drills. The robot assists the dentist, and the optimal treatment plan will be applied directly to the patient. 


The quality of the insertion of dental implants as well as possible risks depend not only on the surgery planning, but as well on performing the surgery as exact as possible according to the treatment plan.
Methods of Computer Aided Surgery are used to plan for these parameters [1],[2],[3]. To apply the so obtained treatment plan, we introduced an assisting robot system at the University Hospital of Heidelberg as a prototype system. We evaluated the system accuracy performing 16 operation plans with phantom mandibles. 

Material and Method

A robot system from Medical Intelligence, Schwabmünchen, Germany, with a reach of 700 mm was used. The PC based software TomoRob from TaMed, Wiesloch, Germany, allows for simulation, visualization, and control of the robot. The position and orientation of the implants was planned based on 3D CT data with TomoRob. Visualization of the robot, the patient couch, the patient, tools and implants are used for planning and control of the surgery. The trajectory planning is based on linear interpolation of start and end point and points between. A collision detection algorithm is integrated to warn during the computer simulation of the surgery.
After acceptance of the plan by the surgeon, the robot starts to move under control of TomoRob. The communication with the robot controller is based on a standard communication protocol.
With pointing with the robot's pointer to a minimum of three artificial landmarks, the robots coordinate systems, the image coordinate system and the patients coordinate system were referenced [4]. We used the corners of a LEGO block, also visible in the CT data, as landmarks. The fixation of the patients jaws during treatment is still necessary at this stage [5].
In the current configuration, the robot is mounted on a trolly, which holds the robot, the small robot controller and the laptop computer for TomoRob. The trolly can be connected to a standard operation table with rigid mountings.
Initial drilling was performed by the surgeon. The robot assisted by holding a drill template according to the preoperative determined position data of the implants.
For the 16 performed model operations with altogether 48 drills for implants, post OP CT examinations were performed without the implants in place to avoid artifacts. Then, implant top (bone entrance) positions and implant end positions (implant apex) were compared against the original plan. 

TomoRob Softwaretool for 3D-planning the implant position

Controlling the plan before drilling

Executing the drilling by robot assistance (Patient in fixed position).

deviation of implant (position 43) end (apex) in mm


First and preliminary results show that, after performing the fusion of pre and post operation CT, deviations of about 1 to 2 mm where found for the implant top and implant apex positions. The time saving effect expected from using robots in surgery depends on the effectiveness of the referencing procedure and the optimization and streamlining of the software for practical use.  


This research was performed at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prof. Dr. Dr. J. Muehling, University of Heidelberg.
The work is being funded partially by the Sonderforschungsbereich 414 "Information Technology in Medicine - Computer and Sensor Supported Surgery" of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.  


  1. Hassfeld, St., J. Brief, R. Krempien, J. Raczkowsky, J. Münchenberg, H.Giess, H.P. Meinzer, U. Mende, H. Wörn, J. Mühling Computerunterstützte Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie. Radiologe 40: 218-226 (2000)
  2. Münchenberg J., Brief J., Hassfeld S., Raczkowsky J., Rembold U., Wörn H.: Expert Supported Operation Planning in the Maxillofacial Surgery (1998), Proceedings of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CAR '98), June, 1998, Tokyo, Japan
  3. Stein W., Hassfeld S., Brief J., Bertovic I., Krempien R., Mühling J.: CT-Based 3D-Planning For Dental Implantology. Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (MMVR '98). San Diego, 1998, S. 137
  4. Brief, J., S. Hassfeld, T. Redlich, C. Ziegler, J. Muenchenberg, S. Daueber, A. Pernozzoli, R. Krempien, P. Slacik, M. Opalek, R. Boesecke, J. Mühling: Robot Assisted Insertion of Dental Implants, A clinical evaluation, CAR 2000, (2000), 932 - 937.
  5. Hassfeld St., J. Brief, W. Stein, C. Ziegler, T. Redlich, J. Raczkowsky, R. Krempien, J. Mühling: Navigationsverfahren in der Implantologie - Stand der Technik und Perspektiven. Implantologie 4: 373-390 (2000)


This poster was submitted by Dr. Jakob Brief.

Correspondence address:
Dr. Jakob Brief
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Heidelberg
INF 400
D-69120 Heidelberg