We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
International Poster Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine



Forgotten password?


Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 19 (2017), No. 2     15. June 2017
Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 19 (2017), No. 2  (15.06.2017)

Poster 1126, Language: English

Comparison of applied radiation dose to the skull with MSCT, dental-CBCT, and 3D-C-arm devices
Mascha, Frank / Griesser, Anne / Pietzka, Sebastian / Schramm, Alexander / Winter, Karsten / Wilde, F.
The intra-operative use of 3D-C-arm devices in the CMF operation theatre is becoming more and more popular. The advantages are particularly described for mid-facial and orbital reconstruction in which intra-operative scanning with 3D-C-arm devices can replace postoperative CBCT or MSCT. The aim of this study was the comparison of different types of 3D-X-ray machines concerning the applied equivalent dosage to the skull.
We compared five devices:
64 slice MSCT; Siemens Somatom
3D-C-arm; Ziehm Vario-FD-3D
3D-C-arm; Siemens Iso-C-3D
3D-C-arm; Siemens Arcardis-Orbic-3D
CBCT; Sirona Gallileos
To determine the equivalent dosage of the devices in different locations, a phantom was loaded with ten dosimeters at the following anatomical regions: eye-lenses, optic-nerves, parotid-glands, submandibular-glands, hypophysis, sublingual-region. For simulation of clinical conditions, the depicted volume of all scans included the mid-face from the maxillary alveolar crest up to the upper frontal sinus.
Comparison of MSCT vs. CBCT showed 4-times higher equivalent dosage for the MSCT. Comparison between C-arms of older generation (Vario-FD-3D, Iso-C-3D) and the MSCT showed 3- to 4-times higher equivalent dosage for the MSCT. The measured equivalent dosage of these two C-arm devices were almost similar to the CBCT. The C-arm Arcardis-Orbic showed a 10-times lower equivalent dosage in comparison to the CBCT and up to a 40-times lower equivalent dosage in comparison to the MSCT.
The results show that use of intra-operative 3D-C-arm devices can significantly reduce applied radiation dosage compared to a post-operative MSCT. Using a C-arm device of a newer generation could even reduce the applied dosage significantly compared to dental CBCT-scans.

Keywords: intraoperative imaging, MSCT, dental-CBCT, 3D-C-arm, computer-assisted surgery, radiation dose

23rd Congress of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
12.-16. September 2016
London, Great Britain