We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website and to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage. You will find more information in our privacy policy. By continuing to use our website, you agree to this. Yes, I agree
International Poster Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine
Login:
username:

password:

Plattform:

Forgotten password?

Registration

Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 18 (2016), No. 4     15. Dec. 2016
Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 18 (2016), No. 4  (15.12.2016)

Poster 1061, Language: English


Effects of Different Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Parameters on Resin-Enamel/Dentin Bond Strength
Ayar, Muhammet Kerim / Yildirim, Tahsin / Yesilyurt, Cemal
Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate microtensile bond strength of a microhybrid resin composite restorative materials which is used with an etch-and-rinse adhesive on enamel and dentin after treatment with Er,Cr:YSGG laser with different output power and pulse frequency combinations.
Methods: Enamel (E) and dentin (D) samples were prepared from bovine incisors. Following immersion of teeth in the acrylic blocks and flattening surfaces, samples were divided into 8 subgroups as follows (n=5): E-Control (no treatments), E-Bur (mechanical roughening was performed using high-speed diamond bur), E-Laser 6W-20Hz, E-Laser 6W-35Hz, E-Laser 6W-50Hz, E-Laser 3W-20Hz, E-Laser 3W-35Hz, E-Laser 3W-50Hz; D-Control (no treatments), D-Bur (mechanical roughening was performed using high-speed diamond bur), D-Laser 3W-20Hz, D-Laser 3W-35Hz, D-Laser 6W-50Hz, D-Laser 1.5W-20Hz, D-Laser 1.5W-35Hz, D-laser 1.5W-50Hz. Following acid-etching all surfaces, composite build-ups were done. Samples were cut into resin-enamel/dentin sticks with dimensions of 0.8 mm². Four sticks were randomly selected from each tooth (n=20) to be tested in microtensile bond strength tests.
Results: E-Laser 3W-50Hz (36.22±6.0 MPa) showed significantly highest bond strength with the exception of E-Control (32.85±9.8 MPa). For dentin, E-Control (27.70 ± 7.0) and E-Bur (24.98 ± 8.8) showed significantly different bond strength from other groups.
Conclusions: Laser irradiation could enhance or impair the microtensile bond strength depending on the tooth structure and laser parameters used.

Keywords: Er,Cr:YSGG laser, dentin, enamel, bond strength, laser parameters

Conference/Exhibition:
47th Meeting of the Continental European Division of the International Association for Dental Research (CED-IADR)
15.-17. October 2015
Gloria Golf Resort & Convention Center, Belek-Antalya, Turkey