We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
International Poster Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine



Forgotten password?


Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 16 (2014), DGMKG     11. June 2014
Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 16 (2014), DGMKG  (11.06.2014)

Supplement, Poster 760, Language: English

Differential diagnosis of a cervical cystic neoplasia
Henningsen, Anders
Introduction: Differential diagnostics of cystic cervical neoplasia is sometimes difficult. Genuine branchiogenic carcinoma, which means carcinoma in lateral cysts of the neck, are rare.
Case presentation: A 51 year old patient presented with a 4-week history of a progressive swelling postero-inferior to the right mandibular angle. Ultrasound of the neck showed a well defined, shmoothly shaped and homogenous cystic mass without hilus sign. A computed tomography scan of the head and neck revealed a 40mm hypodense mass in Level IIa, most likely a central necrotic lymph node metastasis. An 18FDG PET-CT scan revealed a rounded, metabolic active mass with central hypodensity in the right carotid triangle. There was no clinical or radiographic sign for any primary cancer. The mass was excised.
Result: Microscopic examination revealed a branchiogenic carcinoma. We applied a functional neck dissection on the right side and a bilateral tonsillectomy. The right tonsil contained a 2,2cm squamous cell carcinoma which infiltrated almost the whole tonsil (pT2, pN2a, M0).
Discussion and Conclusion: On assumption of a Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) we performed a PET-CT scan, which is clearly superior to single PET, CT or MRI. Despite the size of 2,2cm the primary cancer could not clearly be determined. First histologic examination revealed a branchiogenic carcinoma, which would be a rarity. Proof was given through diagnostic tonsillectomy, which is recommended for CUP of the head and neck but not in branchiogenic carcinoma. It has to be clarified whether branchiogenic carcinoma is a unique entity.

Keywords: branchiogenic, carcinoma, metastasis, neck, tonsil

64. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie (DGMKG)
11.-14. Juni 2014
Mainz, Deutschland