We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
International Poster Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine
Login:
username:

password:

Plattform:

Forgotten password?

Registration

Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 13 (2011), No. 2     15. June 2011
Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 13 (2011), No. 2  (15.06.2011)

Poster 533, Language: English


Retention Characteristics of Implant-Supported Milled Bar Attachments - a comparative in vitro study
Mansour, Sonia / Voigt, Daniel / Setz, Jürgen M. / Boeckler, Arne F.
Objectives: Milled bars [MB] are an alternative option for the retention of implant supported overdentures. The individual manufactured suprastructures [S] adjust precisely and rigidly to the MBs. For this purpose different materials and retention concepts [RC] were introduced. The aim of this study was to compare initial and long-term retention characteristics and wear of MBs from different materials and different RCs used to retain overdentures to dental im-plants.
Methods: 7 different MB-S-combinations (20x7x2mm) with different RC were indi-vidually fabricated: gold&electro-plated-S [GG], cobalt-chromium&electro-plated-S [EG], tita-nium&electro-plated-S [TG], zirconium&electro-plated-S [ZG], cobalt-chromium&spark-erroded-S [EF], titanium&spark-erroded-S [TF], zirconium&spark-erroded-S [ZF]. 5 speci-mens of each group (n=35) were screwed to 2 implants (Xive, Friadent) and were long-term tested (5000 hysteresis cycles) in a universal test machine (v=40mm/min, s=2mm, Fmax=50N, artificial saliva=23°C). Retention forces were constantly recorded. MB-S-combinations were analysed for superficial degradation (SEM). For evaluation of the total wear the mean-retention-force [MRF] of the first and last 250 cycles were calculated and sta-tistically compared (ANOVA, Bonferroni, P<0.05).
Results: Initial MRF differed from 5.35N [TF] to 21.68N [EG]. After long-term cycling the resulting MRF differed from 2.41N [TF] to 18.45N [EG]. Each MB-S-combination produced a characteristic curve. MRF-change (Delta F=Fmax-final - Fmax-initial) differed from -10.13N [EF] to +2.14N [GG] (p<0.001) The MRF-alteration differed from -54.95% [TF] to +17.09% [GG]. SEM-analysis revealed charac-teristic degradations of the corresponding material surfaces.
Conclusion: There were differ-ences between the initial pull-off-forces of the tested MB-S-combinations. Standardized long-term-cycling exposed specific changes of the retention characteristics and resulting pull-off-forces in regard to bar material and retentive superstructure designs.

Keywords: implant, milled bar, attachments, retention forces, long-term retention

Conference/Exhibition:
July 14-17, 2010
88th General Session & Exhibition of the IADR
Barcelona