International Poster Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine



Forgotten password?


Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 11 (2009), No. 1     15. Mar. 2009

Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 2009, Vol 11 No 1, Poster 432

Developmental Failure of One or More Teeth in Families

Familial missing teeth

Language: English

Prof. Dr. Emilia Severin, Dr. Crenguta Albu, Dr.Dinu Albu, Dr.Ileana Ioachim,
Genetics Department
Prof. Dr. Dragos Stanciu,
Orthodontics Department
Dr. Arina Vinereanu,
Pedodontics Department, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

July 12-17, 2008
XX. International Congress of Genetics
Berlin, Germany


Failure of tooth development at the bud stage causes tooth agenesis; isolated tooth agenesis is one of the most common developmental anomalies of human permanent dentition; tooth agenesis tends to run in families, may aggregate within families, suggesting a genetic cause. Excluding the third molar, several terms are used to describe tooth agenesis: hypodontia is the absence of less than six teeth, oligodontia (severe hypodontia) is the agenesis of six or more permanent teeth and anodontia is complete absence of teeth [1, 2, 3]. Treatment depends on the severity, location, aesthetic and functional problems of missing teeth [2]. The treatment of patients affected by severe hypodontia is complex and expensive and may involve a combination of pediatric dentistry, orthodontics, prosthodontics, and implantology [4].


Study aims: to evaluate the pattern of missing teeth in families, to observe similarities and differences of dental phenotype among affected relatives, to characterize the mode of inheritance and to identify distinct groups of patients for further molecular investigations.

Material and Methods

Clinical examinations were carried out on 26 Caucasian patients from 11 families with a family history of missing teeth. Combined examination of clinical phenotypes and panoramic radiographs improved the precision of diagnosis. Family study was used to determine whether there is a hereditary basis for tooth agenesis.


In all families, the patients and their affected relatives did not share the same pattern of missing teeth. There were differences according to the tooth type, region, symmetry and number of teeth involved even in the same family. Most cases with tooth agenesis lack one or two permanent teeth.The most common missing teeth were: upper lateral incisors, second lower and upper premolars, lower central incisors, upper canines. Symmetrical hypodontia and anterior tooth agenesis were predominant. Anomalies of tooth-size and tooth-shape were observed in association with hypodontia phenotype. For further molecular investigations two groups were identified: 1. normal deciduous dentition / abnormal permanent dentition; 2. both abnormal primary and permanent dentitions.

Family 1
mother to daughter transmission
Age (years) 34 12 10
Hypodontia (number of missing permanent teeth) Unilateral hypodontia (1) Bilateral hypodontia (2) Bilateral (severe) hypodontia (8)
Maxilla (missing teeth) Left lateral incisor / peg-shaped right lateral incisor Upper lateral incisors Upper lateral incisors, canines, second premolars
Mandible (missing teeth) Second premolars
Fig 1: family 1 – pedigree Fig 2: family 1 mother
Fig 3: family 1 daughter II2 Fig 4: family 1 daughter II1
Family 2
father to son transmission
Age (years) 79 56 27
Hypodontia (number of missing permanent teeth) Bilateral hypodontia (2) Bilateral hypodontia (2) Bilateral hypodontia (2)
Mandible (missing teeth) Central incisors Central incisors Central incisors
Fig 5: family 2 – pedigree Fig 6: proband III2 intraoral view – congenitally missing lower central incisors
Fig 7: proband III2 oral view with tooth agenesis of lower central incisors
Fig 8: proband III2 – orthopantomogram
Family 3
father to daughter transmission
Age (years) 36 12 12
Hypodontia (number of missing permanent teeth) Bilateral hypodontia (2) Unilateral hypodontia (1) Bilateral hypodontia (2)
Maxilla (missing teeth) Left lateral incisors / peg-shaped right lateral incisor Lateral incisors
Mandible (missing teeth) Second premolars
Fig 9: family 3 – pedigree Fig 10: proband II1 – oral view: congenital agenesis of upper left lateral incisor associated with peg-shaped right lateral incicisor
Family 4
mother to daughter and son transmission
Age (years) 36 13 10
Hypodontia (number of missing permanent teeth) Bilateral hypodontia (6) Bilateral hypodontia (16) Bilateral hypodontia (6)
Maxilla (missing teeth) Lateral incisors, second prmeolars Central and lateral incisors, canines, first premolars Lateral incisors
Mandible (missing teeth) Second premolars Central and lateral incisors, canines, first premolars Lateral incisors, canines
Fig 11: family 4 – pedigree Fig 12: daughter III2 – oral view: bilateral severe hypodontia
Fig 13: daughter III2 orthopantomogram Fig 14: son III3 – oral view: bilateral hypodontia (congenital lack of upper lateral incisors, lower lateral incisors and lower canines)
Fig 15: son III3 – orthopantomogram


Individuals within the same family would be expected to have the exactly mutant genes and their different dental profiles could demonstrate the gene expression variation. Peg-shaped lateral incisors may reflect incomplete expression of a gene defect that causes tooth agenesis. Unilateral tooth agenesis may be a result of reduce penetrance on the affected (right or left) side of the jaw.Familial isolated tooth agenesis is a genetic trait with clinical heterogeneity and autosomal dominant inheritance pattern.


  1. Bailleul-Forestier I., Molla M., Verloes A., Berdal A.: The genetic basis of inherited anomalies of the teeth: Part I: Clinical and molecular aspects of non-syndromic dental disorders, European Journal of Medical Genetics, 2008, 51, 273-291.
  2. Arte S.: Phenotypic and Genotypic features of Familial Hypodontia. Doctoral Thesis. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki; 2001.
  3. Stevenson R.E., Hall J.G., Human Malformations and Related Anomalies, Second Edition, Oxford university Press, 2005, 425-463.
  4. Vastardis H. The genetics of human tooth agenesis: new discoveries for understanding dental anomalies. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2000; 117: 650-656.
  5. Hu JC-C., Simmer JP. : Developmental biology and genetics of dental malformations, Orthodontics&Craniofacial Research, 2007, 10 (2), 45-52.
  6. Thesleff I. The genetic basis of tooth development and dental defects. Am J Med Genet A. 2006 (Dec); 140(23):2530-5.
  7. Daugaard-Jensen J, Nodal M, Skovgaard LT, Kjaer I. Comparison of the pattern of agenesis in the primary and permanent dentitions in a population characterized by agenesis in the primary dentition. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 1997; 7: 143-148.
  8. Pemberton TJ, Das P and Patel PI, Hypodontia: Genetics and future perspectives. Brazilian Journal of Oral Science, 2005; 4:695-706.

This Poster was submitted by Prof. Dr. Emilia Severin.

Correspondence address:
Prof. Dr. Emilia Severin
"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy
24, Kiseleff Street
011346 Bucharest