Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 2001, Vol 3 No 1, Poster 63
The effect of laser - assisted uvolopalatoplasty (LAUP) on rhonchopathy
Author(s): Jörg Schlieper, Bernhard Brinkmann, Andreas Karmeier, Thomas Pakusa
Group Practice for Oral - Maxillofacial Surgery, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Michaeliskrankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany
78th general session of the IADR
Washington, DC, USA
The retrovelar space is the narrowest region within the pharyngeal airway. This region causes complete or partial obstruction in most patients with OSAS (1). As a result of the altered neuromuscular activity during sleep and the mechanisms that occur at the same time, which have been discussed as being the cause of the obstruction, as a result of the vibration of the uvula, the velum, the arcus palatoglossus and palatopharyngeus, a more or less pronounced snoring noise may be produced. Factors which promote or trigger this are, in particular, hyperplasia of the soft palate, the arcus palatoglossus and palatopharyngeus and the tonsils, retrognathy, adiposity with a high standing tongue or macroglossia. Consequently, there are a multitude of approaches to therapy for reducing snoring (2). By means of a protrusive mandibular device (PMD), the mandible can be positioned in a more ventral position in relation to the maxilla, and in so doing a relative dilation of the oropharyngeal airway results (6,7,8). The success rate for the various surgical alternatives (3) depends to a large extent upon the indication status for such operations (8). The plastic correction of the soft palate parts down to the pharynx (UVPP) has been well documented in the literature (5,10), but can only be carried out under general anaesthesia with the patient receiving treatment as an inpatient. A new technique was introduced by Kamami (4) as a treatment which places less strain on the patients and which can also be carried out ambulant, under local anaesthesia, using a CO2 laser (LAUP).
The LAUP is a modified UVPP with a shorter time required for surgery, which enables the procedure to be carried out as outpatient treatment under local anaesthesia, with less discomfort for the patient (4,5). Reduction in snoring produced by LAUP has also been demonstrated, as has the therapeutic effect on OSA (10). This retrospective study was intended to contribute to the clarification of the questions of the extent to which a reduction in snoring can be achieved using LAUP and which typical complications may appear in this context, in order to be able to discuss additional indications for this surgical method.
|Figure 1 and 2:
Situation with normal tongue position (Fig. 1) and low standing tongue (Fig.2) before (a), immediately after (b) and 2 yeares after LAUP.
Material and Methods
In the period from 1996 to early 1998, 200 patients were treated with snoring problems (m: 179; f: 21; average age 47 years) with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA, AHI < 20). Patients had undergone initial somnography or polysomnography. The assessment of anatomical factors and the corresponding classification into three groups, A, B, and C, with different primary therapies (Table 1) took place with reference to clinical and radiological examinations. In the case of patients in groups A and B, treatment consisted primarily of weight reduction or treatment with protrusive mandibular device (PMD), respectively. For the remaining 100 patients belonging to group C, we first of all carried out a LAUP. Operations were performed by two surgeon of the same team. We reduced the free margin of the hyperplastic soft palate structures (uvula, velum) down to the pharynx (arcus palatoglossus and arcus palatopharyngeus), without affecting the musculature.The patients in group C were examined one year after the operation and were questioned about any postoperative complications and complaints.
Classification into three groups A, B, and C.
|n = 200 (AHI<20)
||BMI > 28
||Retrognathia and /or h-s tongue
||weight loss > 10 kg, PMD
||Protrusive mandibular device (PMD)
The following complications were established (100 patients, m: 85, f: 15):
two patients with minimal subsequent bleeding and who required no surgical intervention, two otitis media which could be controlled with conservative therapy and one temporary rhinolalia aperta. There were no wound infections.The average duration of pain following the operation was around 7 days (table 2). 83% of the patients reported that disturbing noises due to snoring no longer occurred or that noises due to snoring no longer occurred at all (table 3).
Mean numbers of days with pain after LAUP.
|Days of pain
The effect of LAUP on rhonchopathy between 6 weeks and 1 year.
|Dissapearence of snoring
||early relaps (< 6 Mo)
||late relaps (> 6 Mo)
Discussion and Conclusions
A complete or partial reduction in snoring without disturbing effect was observed in 83% one year after the first operation (LAUP). A discrepancy between objective and subjective assessment of the reduction in snoring has indeed been reported (5). What is decisive for the success of the treatment of this group of patients with light OSA (AHI < 20) is, however, solely the subjective feeling. The rate of complications after a LAUP has been carried out under local anaesthesia is comparable with other investigations (4) and is less than that for UVPP carried out under general anaesthesia (5). After the LAUP, no serious or persistent complications occurred - the need for inpatient care could be avoided. The further treatment of patients without a reduction in snoring or with only an insufficient reduction in snoring following LAUP is to be sought not in a renewed operation but rather in therapy with PMD (6,7,9). The indication for LAUP is not limited exclusively to patients with primary rhonchopathy, but extends to patients with OSA (10).
The investigation confirmed the high rate of success with LAUP, as well as the extremely low rate of complications associated with this surgical procedure.Wider establishment of an indication for LAUP within the framework of step by step combination therapy (LAUP, PMD, PAP), in the case of patients with OSA, is therefore entirely justified and is to be considered as being therapeutically useful.
- M. S. Badr (1998) Pathophysiology of upper airway obstruction during sleep. Clinics in Chest Medicine 19 (1): 21-32
- R. B. Berry, A. J. Block (1994) Positive nasal airway pressure eliminates snoring as well as obstructive sleep apnea, Chest; 85: 15-20
- K. Hörmann, K. Hirth, J. T. Maurer (1999) Surgical therapy of sleep-related respiratory disorders. HNO 47 (4): 226-235
- Y.V. Kamami (1994) Outpatient treatment of snoring with CO2 laser. Journal of Otolaryngology; 23 (6): 391-394
- T. Langing, J.-L. Pépin, S. Pendlebury, H. Baranton-Cantin, G. Ferretti, E. Reyt, P. Lévy (1998) Upper airway changes in snorers and mild sleep apnea sufferers after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP). Chest 113 (6): 1595-1603
- M. Marklund, A. Franklin, C. Sahlin, R. Lundgren (1998) The effect of a mandibular device on apneas and sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 113 (3): 707-713
- R. P. Millman, C. L. Rosenberg, N. R. Kramer (1998) Oral appliances in the treatement of snoring and sleep apnea. Clinics in Chest Medicine 19 (1): 69-75
- W. Pirsig (1998) Obstruktive Schlafapnoe (OSA) und obstruktives Schnarchen. Atmung & Schlaf; 3 (2) 98: 33-33
- W. Schmidt-Nowara, A. Lowe, L. Wiegand (1995) Oral appliances for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review. Sleep; 18: 501-510
- R. P. Walker, T. Garrity, C. Gopalsmi (1999) Early polysomnographic findings and long-term subjective results in sleep apnea patients treated with laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty. Laryngoscope 109 (9): 1438-1441
This Poster was submitted on 11.02.01 by
Dr. Dr. Jörg Schlieper.
Dr. Dr. Jörg Schlieper
Tel.: 040 / 589 77 890